How do you explain to someone that having your rock hard cock in a guys ass, as you pound away. The bottom guy is leaking pre-cum like a sieve, and about to have one of the best orgasms of his life. That this happens between the two guys on a regular basis, that its not a gay action.
I know that having a cock in a guys ass, and making out with him at the same time, is pretty much a definitive answer to the question of what gay is, but somehow it's not. I think this is what goes to the core of what being bi-sexual means.
By the way, this is one of the greatest ab workouts that is possible, I need to work my abs more.
I'd comment if I knew what you were talking about but I haven't a clue! Nice gif, may I say.
ReplyDeleteThe sexual relations between human beings are far more complicated than we think. Some relationships don't fit well in the pigeon hole we have defined as a society. We've so much more to learn and to experience! - V
ReplyDeleteI suspect you may be talking about something that I've been exploring for many years: an idea or measure that I've used to understand my own sexuality.
ReplyDeleteMy theory requires the segregation of sex from sexuality in order to examine them independently.
Sex is limited to only a physical act, which results in busting a nut, nothing more and nothing less, while allowing the engagement of one’s mind since sex can be as much mental as it is physical.
Therefore, sex is anything that gets you off.
One’s sexuality is far more complex and involves more sentimental attachments like love and affection. It can be governed by more biological attractions. Sexuality is an extension of such -- to the degree that it impacts identity with influences broadening way beyond any physical act.
This is just a snapshot of my theory and assuming I’ve made my case however abbreviated, than the following may be true:
--If it feels good and gets you off, it’s sex but it does not require a redefinition of one’s sexuality or identity.
So a man who identifies himself as str8 can physically explore sex with another man as a means of getting off while not necessarily employing love or even attraction. The scenario’s appeal (mental engagement), can overcome one’s traditional idea of attraction.
I believe this is what you were referring to when you characterized the hot-as-fuck-scene above as not being gay. I also believe as we continue to evolve as a species, the distinction between sex and sexual identity will widen.
-TGK
GK
ReplyDeleteYes your theory is probably what I mean, I'm going to have to study it a bit more to be sure for myself.
The other issue that may or may not be explained by your theory is of a bottom that I spent some time with recently. He had a wife that used a strap-on with him and they did some pretty kinky stuff, but it was all between a married man and a woman. Now he is divorced and him and I do things that him and his wife use to do together. I understand that it is sex, but he had a sexual relationship with a person that performed similar acts upon his person, so where is the separation in this? and would that make me the woman in a case like this?
Also could there be another classification of platonic love, say between best friends? and could you have a sexual relationship with someone yet not have sex with them?